Nuffnang

Showing posts with label Republican. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican. Show all posts

Friday, November 16, 2012

Political Profiling

from ‘Lip Service’ by Marianne LaFrance
 
It is said that a politician’s personality opens or closes doors but actually how a candidate’s personality is perceived holds more sway. There is, in fact, a startling consensus among voters across several countries as to what traits they want to see in their political leaders. The desired traits are extroversion and trustworthiness.

Across the ideological spectrum, these two traits trump all other, ostensibly relevant characteristics. When people think about family, friends, co-workers and celebrities, extroversion and trustworthiness are not the first traits that come to mind., but they are at the top of voters’ lists for what they want in a political leader.

How do constituents detect a candidate’s level of extroversion and trustworthiness? Despite claims by some that they can look a person in the eye and know whether that person can be trusted, the eyes themselves are not a measure of character. The muscles around the eyes are where the cues lie.

We glean impressions of people from what the social psychologist Nalini Ambady calls “thin slices,”, glimpses of their faces and brief sounds of their voices. Indeed, psychologists have a wealth of data showing that impressions about what a person is like are made extraordinarily quickly and from amazingly little information. Often enough, these impressions are dead on. In one study, research subjects were shown pictures of unfamiliar candidates for less than second and asked to hazard a guess about whether they would win the election in which they were running. Not everyone was up to the task, but a significant number were able to do so with striking accuracy.

These findings deserve a second look because of what they tell us about what the research participants were actually able to do. Subjects were not asked whom they personally would vote for after having a fleeting glance at the photograph. Rather, they were asked to consider what a majority of voters would do. The essence of their accuracy was in knowing other people’s preferences in political candidates. Faces matter hugely in our assessment of people, and many of us are on the same page about what those assessments are.

Do faces also tell us something about voters? Amazingly, yes. Citizens who lean in a liberal direction smile more on average than citizens who bend in a conservation direction. Does this mean that liberals are happier than conservatives? No, actually conservatives are happier. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 47 percent conservative Republicans in the United States described themselves as “very happy” as compared with only 28 percent of liberal Democrats.

So, why do liberals smile more than conservatives, if it is not because they’re feeling jollier than conservatives? You will recall that while spontaneous smiles reflect positive emotion, people also smile voluntarily, and those smiles reflect not inner emotion but other intentions. In short, liberals’ smiles signal a more cooperative, non-aggressive orientation. This sounds like a little like the poet Robert Frost’s definition of a liberal as a man too broad-minded to take his own side in a quarrel.

New findings also indicate that liberals are perceived differently from conservatives by those who do not know their political slant. If a person comes as warm, it is more likely that he or she is a Democrat. If a person comes across as powerful, the data show that he or she is more likely to be a Republican.


 
 ‘Lip Service’ by Marianne LaFrance

Friday, November 9, 2012

How Your Body Language Chooses a President

by Carol Kinsey Goman



Politicians are keenly aware that they’re judged not only by their verbal message, but also by their nonverbal communication.  Regardless of your political affiliation, the presidential debates gave us a great platform for observing what body language and speaking styles can do to create impressions. And I posted my observations after each debate.

But, while I was monitoring the debaters’ body language, researchers at The Center for Body Language (in Belgium) were using webcams to monitor the emotions of voters across the United States as they watched the debates. By analyzing the subtle facial movements (micro expressions) of viewers, they were hoping to find out how people really felt about about the candidates.

Their findings:
 
  • The study shows why the election is almost a tie, with a very slight advantage for Obama and Romney on different points.
  • The large majority of Independent voters turn out to be emotionally indifferent for both of the candidates; however 13% of those voters feel emotionally more connected with Obama and react with a micro expression of disgust on Romney’s sarcastic comments.
  • 52% of Independent voters find Romney’s sarcastic Obama-denigrating humor funny.
  • Many Democrats show a micro expression of happiness that Obama ended the Iraq war. Republicans too.
  • 19% of Democrats laugh at Romney’s speeches as at a joke.
  • 26% of Republicans show very strong micro expressions of anger and disgust when seeing Obama. Some of them seem literally to hate Obama. The opposite is not the case: very few Obama supporters seem to “hate” Romney.
  • Surprising fact: 16% of Republicans seem to react with negative emotions when seeing Romney’s picture.
  • Supporters of both candidates are engaged very seriously when their leaders are talking, while they are more easily distracted when the candidate of the opposition is speaking.
  • Many Republicans react clearly with micro expressions of pleasure on Romney’s denigrating humor about Obama.
  • By making his remarks about Romney’s plans in most cases more subtle and sophisticated, Obama elicits less negative emotions with both Democrats and Republicans.

Their Conclusion:

It’s an extremely close race between Obama and Romney. If Obama wins, it will be thanks to the stronger emotional connection he has with his supporters, while Romney leads by playing strongly against his opponent.

And when they replicated this study in 15 countries in Europe, Obama had almost double more positive emotional impact on people outside the USA compared to Romney. If Europeans could vote, Obama would win.